Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets coalesced with other packets to make a 1200 byte UDP datagram could be split up by the network (#3317)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Fri, 03 January 2020 18:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB90120805
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:55:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id wr8iVUde_AFP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF8A120846
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net
(github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68])
by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BBD6A0A92
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:55:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1578077710;
bh=lna+dPncsNCDKloFlcY6e+t5zACa/e3sbn70u3hFgiY=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=QcK+wvIGWm+KZftv5B+0ROQtzDDPaW2dd8YUvhMGselwueig0XwkLkqyoar3bev5T
eB8myynuHtdeDNIeXzWs1cRpGV7lP9E64w5EOKbHL6/0SrHYONyTX4DNtDO2Pd/VlV
GpH8WLlQe97iImROVGR2a902zc6sjs91l8M+PsO8=
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:55:10 -0800
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJKZ3PLZH6VOATP4V6FV4DTAI5EVBNHHCA7KIGA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317/570664103@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets coalesced with
other packets to make a 1200 byte UDP datagram could be split up by the
network (#3317)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5e0f8e0e29923_220c3ff8126cd9601711c9";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XJWgrHePwVP8Csg4mR5aGGqJvIc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 18:55:13 -0000
I agree. Let's stick with Option 1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317#issuecomment-570664103
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets co… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar