Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify the state a client stores with a token (#3150)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C05120288 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZGL1lbd5VNh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21A812004E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.57]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ABB6E1594 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572009050; bh=wmX0xlOikUWXeozDwJPZbSCFZtUMuqNwKYXqJyaYjrY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=a+mfKxx7IKBW9hAalx6M98I7Ph6/pD0aIDLWa+4TnNWWt+HnusQG6IJduJouXBddj 6HicavhZV7bB8NYe2VTh70NFfwQhnMDHHCfpu8LIiJpNtkoek4evohOqbD44q3sNI1 85hggWdK9SI9yQgTci0vo0avxLjUCmb+T1vlItHI=
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:10:50 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6P23XORTHIEW75XGV3YA2OVEVBNHHB5B4MBE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150/c546347449@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify the state a client stores with a token (#3150)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db2f45a353f6_37fb3f8b24ecd9682857fe"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XK5QRD1rhBSKu9xWZxpeniPfzFc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:10:53 -0000

If you're going to continue with 0-RTT, but not trust the token, why not just limit the amount sent by the amplification factor?  The receipt of a Handshake packet constitutes path validation.

Also, a Retry doesn't allow you to acknowledge the client's Initial or any 0-RTT packets.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150#issuecomment-546347449