Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)

Matt Olson <> Tue, 26 March 2019 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71253120A05 for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0EbJ1LOxIjL for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D121209F2 for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:36:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1553628988; bh=bIgF+JjxLgMPRYMfzMcKSx+DHvedXWAmdfWmzXb1nVU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RuxrsmkA4oy+9X/852REdV+frh1kcaSDQiG75Y97zqXTevIgC8nGhKrGhUZY7PCyx 5CZQ+Nslu97HGApxjeZ0dv7B77UjwKkAFPRiLSqhMp6y08MglnxTc+EePvDJm1V/Mt IOoLOYVve42DbK5q0YalHDhQk5elbrse3Vwq6ZfA=
From: Matt Olson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1986/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9a7f3c1be01_32e63fa979ed45c470274"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: maolson-msft
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 19:36:32 -0000

Hi, sorry for letting this issue sit. Adding dynamic reordering tolerance is far from noncontroversial, so I'll close this for now. Maybe we can consider it in the next version.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: