Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition of the ACK FRAME N bit (#633)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 16 June 2017 06:14 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF57128D16 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0R9jmzTo1_C2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69028128AFE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=X5giXR6GzYAuoU1OkNpQtdtrbU0=; b=JjURHFxUU2Vqbfsq fxtsiHcd9R+IcbahOEAd9bI4Oo8FySj7AGFq+r4QHx02ZiU8nHHGw+nFDzhKA1EB agw/h954Z/6Zim43faydBi+fYjWj/1mdZnGMLmCD+rJ0HasYeOZ4iUyhgALPRv3c TfAOBGb602Skth+K/3ir646YKHM=
Received: by filter0958p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0958p1mdw1-20751-59437726-1F 2017-06-16 06:13:58.532365829 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id MsQI_GEZQFSEdIBWR4NI7Q for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:13:58.321 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:13:58 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab96fd30dff9592a35889c28bd13857677c186b16b92cf00000001155b392692a169ce0e13f7e4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/633/c308942433@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/633@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/633@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition of the ACK FRAME N bit (#633)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59437726363b0_4f983fb154341c38494c3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2/Ef7bGp5xJBIfXe+kZBlxCLXC91MWY8epOw EPUdH4aDch98FOGdAxWBF4dWyMMDwNpy0paGeqf+W9kO6j/9YMbhtSmsY7sHzZjbkMR4lcq8GWA5ct wvKvEKkPOyMPbjsI1n+2WDDJgqHiAzf3NNCQM00E4FhQIvLPLT0PuGeQCsZnaf4M16ADO8HctmBr70 o=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Xj_eEV-3CqHe7O4r_MJV9fij8N8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:14:01 -0000
That doesn't make sense to me. Why would it be optional if the count is 0. That just adds ambiguity. Then it should always be present and the N-bit removed, or it should not be permitted when the count is 0. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/633#issuecomment-308942433
- [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition of th… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition o… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] correct the definition o… ianswett