IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow endpoints to generate traffic keys asynchronously (#3874)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 16 July 2020 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2DA3A0BD6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rrlbpl-JGELJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127223A0BD9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-0f7e7fd.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-0f7e7fd.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.110.17]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615D3281ABC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594872865; bh=jcFjPwJoMzsQQ/GY6vW285Oy1zVyo+A9FAIwIuVQHCI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=a+mh+mCliCAl9DhE/nBRRiAnCsTeXeD4DANlP0zTh8UoHKYZi8qgzVWtoibB4QAjI wXvSlry7c49ZQfhxWX5ythvwTslarcWdIcRUAbs5Gd20+vQB4Ygd6PJFQ42KRiG3Z6 BiVYRGNuGHae3L7qqAjpv0+3X29lyHdbbBtXucNI=
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:14:25 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY4OCCMGHMOI642AUV5DO2SDEVBNHHCN3MY3A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874/c659147169@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow endpoints to generate traffic keys asynchronously (#3874)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f0fd42150e09_bb03f9e8b4cd95c731f2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XlcSGKayQQ_R4gSOc37efY6LHSM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 04:14:27 -0000

To make the change of status clear, the change to probing keeps probes for application data disabled until handshake confirmation rather than handshake completion.  This is based on the conclusions in [this comment](https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3821#issuecomment-658507628).  I think that PR is an incremental change in that direction, but more is needed to complete the set of changes proposed there.

My suggestion would be to get agreement on the overall strategy, as proposed.  Then we can take this PR and follow up with more comprehensive/systemic fixes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874#issuecomment-659147169

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email