Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discarding Initial context too soon leads to deadlock (#3395)

Christian Huitema <> Sat, 25 January 2020 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4573120052 for <>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUQMG_K2xW4O for <>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30BA120044 for <>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F76261578 for <>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:18:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579979931; bh=yjelCkhklxXWevpEMmDzzHU5ft5zcOykEV8fWFWSY1s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=T9gHe3bsm9Uq1NL3kqXQa38Ubgb8VIKk/YQyScGQ+eF1S6D7dxyi17+THrvduHasS T36dZGtpuISY3G97BjGnnuOCYMltUOLrWvJHWXdnOnGHinwGpkRdpwpNYNhfEYfNgI KVUazI2xLPee23BsOS/opNmFoQ5Yjp57tADCXvxM=
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:18:51 -0800
From: Christian Huitema <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3395/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discarding Initial context too soon leads to deadlock (#3395)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e2c949be54e_70593fd9344cd964235873"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 19:18:54 -0000

I guess this is most;y an editorial issue. The implementer that just reads could just make the bad decision of sending an ack-only handshake, dropping the Initial context, and not thinking any more about it. Adding a back pointer to 8.1. would warn this implementer about potential consequences.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: