Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 January 2019 07:00 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9BA130FA0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 23:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxGDTxsdVS6r for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 23:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4058012896A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 23:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 23:00:51 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548658851; bh=rrnBVv5nnQAHIExlIDRU8kE5496YD1IKYMRX8UY7ku0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gk2f64eSlV8F44su+7zp57DO9y7Vr8eQP448yr0Rnn8BMyUFLvvOBtU7eNK72XmfP makbY3ZRsCYkiS/CG1NiUvDumM9QqCxjcFmo8/OG8w1vHPN9Oz84jg8s230oxjm+yF tyosh0xTzQ7V6QnPXk6RJwlSSmVALf2+xIWP5uvE=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe774b48908c84343a30a71aaa5693d022d31e45192cf0000000118666aa392a169ce1784eaec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267/458018063@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4ea8a3170e6_3b403f8a38ed45c010713de"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XtshioyG0kH1dYytJr273j5zaOs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:00:54 -0000
> Current design guarantees that both endpoints will have 1-RTT read and write keys 3-PTO before the handshake keys are dropped (I think we can agree on this). Both endpoints have the 1-RTT keys, but the client doesn't know that the server has them, since the ACK for the CFIN was lost. For the client, this situation is indistinguishable from the CFIN itself being lost, so it has to keep retransmitting it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267#issuecomment-458018063
- [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets… Martin Thomson