Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763)
mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 21:45 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AE51345C1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3tR-J8SeKOw for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DBF1345BE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=yBD38vRiQaGcMCr8QkZIDuY4gb4=; b=EdLoE7BiQkRjEGYW H4iZRNY2I+oblmtHIawQNdr//XlI3xSoz29o81zWpj87jJ5HeUv+5RlmHXI1fKGH Tv14HJiKj7nh8YXu2waE2kGcoy9qQW1Ulxra5aAhQx+I/0fqij8cT+MWzKdSD1I2 upO5t1oXjaowQ8EPxIAN/n7rojI=
Received: by filter0182p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0182p1las1-721-59C978E9-30 2017-09-25 21:45:13.764243644 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id -RBjd2v3RxqsB0ig1-qrzg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:45:13.610 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:45:13 +0000
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb37e91ebc9ccd29b6526a99594742e26256a753b92cf0000000115e13ae992a169ce0f3d8f2a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763/332022965@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59c978e973fcc_68fe3fe66b374f888542c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Mh5b1Cdf7ePALrQtleaRv7aU9yzp4j0acnM tXzu0DlVrXUmATSzhQuYOAAKKoCIUEVVheHo41WxhrakwdVmkaUBIkP+kpyFEe1UZ1EBH0Cb0sltbw G7CoTDWzCZZ1FEVrWpikUS9snE/8jcW863x7OJ4tgH5NsAROSuAEE/Ew6Q==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Y1MoM5Tkce_ZDfbJYzVWxWMPwgI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:45:26 -0000
But, as Ian said, you should probably also not use the word 'retransmit' here. If you detect that an ack frame was lost, you should make sure that (in a reasonable amount of time) a new ack frame is send that contains at least the information that the lost ack frame was carrying and maybe even have newer information as well. In some cases you may have already send another ack frame that also contains this information in the mean time and you potentially do have to do anything. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763#issuecomment-332022965
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Mike Bishop