Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 08:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81071311EA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 01:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UaA205x5t9pA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 01:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0F2131090 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 01:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:21:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1538554892; bh=FE7klFqfpFHLh84hAqWobXDtgsbVOAHnrdW6MrDtbmE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i5ZLklYNmWrgLS0FW2UTRgYxX/bjihlNLeU3htetTe+lRa5KqK9mZc6B6uIHe45R2 zb+E83V3iLhyYEtrL3sW77RxlT24CatGfI0UzZY2PjjPHo/KVABDqdG/RAoiPdKn9k c4r4joUKYfCqBfanKJZZww8ZZEkdcsWNQ23v9aqU=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab58a18a05cf4be1cbe2131116d0f464a477e4b1f092cf0000000117cc3e0c92a169ce15d27d33@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828/426551514@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bb47c0ca66d4_5a7e3fbc39cd45bc478ce"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/YDTh_8pAUGXJ7zkf-TUH6oCODYs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:21:35 -0000
Different processes can connect on the same IP pair. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828#issuecomment-426551514
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied p… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson