Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames to describe varint structures (#3115)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 29 October 2019 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FCC12008D for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zm0I0cKm1A4c for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99082120046 for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:07:57 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572322077; bh=DwRPKci9kYRbl6veMZI9NCdC74D4Ez9gw/+0+AHh5os=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NRgg4r7wsQo93fww66oHK8rubkU6WvmM1vI2V1LHzbK28CNxfbUndZ0QIJNMy55T9 rNKvoLDQuO0wlQnu4f6tMVJdcf7u4D/pjheThw0Pw4RVErrMeUMaqsWQ0MCK+eAUmD 8PJi4r0FTF4ep+xHiFyvTAey2idLtwUyIiGgDQOA=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3115/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames to describe varint structures (#3115)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db7bb1d5fce9_8533fc3f22cd9686360"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:08:00 -0000

I'd just like to point out that the only sane approach here is to use ASN.1 with PER so that we can get bit-level alignment.  I believe that with care it shouldn't matter whether we pick the aligned or unaligned variant.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: