Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe a new version negotiation mechanism which allows for (#1755)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 19 September 2018 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6837C130E17 for <>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0o_pg5LCRQpQ for <>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01454130E12 for <>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=qXPYTBdrtShFM0cX8X31b90Zn4Q=; b=JQ0xoIqZT1vjce8O G4c7ZZ+w3esgLufHnXfzC+jUcGDiKXjeCITraAOqMiIibU3QPU4JXcJzc0xf1fcK 6+qfxpFu4m4wSOKuyAo3t0ndNSfUGi1chjNi7DUqfSxpfYSt6Ku+nuBFoHePufUI VqEzIvsEj9okkB8CYlVvUZbfVzw=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1204p1las1-768-5BA28226-35 2018-09-19 17:06:47.014673259 +0000 UTC m=+1105879.929501239
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id seSaGouCRX6hRsyKz5Zysg for <>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:06:46.898 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97DDC0D0F for <>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:06:47 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1755/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe a new version negotiation mechanism which allows for (#1755)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ba28226d78d7_6a303fd3edad45c01100fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3TQupwctu2RBW5krAIYOIun/hbFskOKeM+XW 5/vW0LIk8p2+dLK82TFxJMk9bC0Gbxrsb2twFn+5zyuepPz8q7SiKNBigMbo3Z7wOyWHKdRNYAlMXM ZA0SfczWv2VdhhCqUr0E9QhBA9Krp14UBN0Um2W5gZs+p7laXfKgropzojHumQuQLNjR1k5jcTiMiI Q=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:06:51 -0000

I'm not strongly opposed to this as an optimization, but it doesn't feel necessary for QUICv1.  You remove a lot of text, but it's adding a second layer of version negotiation -- I would expect that it needs more text, and I'm not convinced the text you removed is obsoleted by adding a second way to negotiate.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: