Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 02 August 2019 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35ACD120090 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zw3FcK2Z-53r for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8963912001A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:57:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1564711061; bh=v5qCfm2ohSfTwMT1mzKOVnjM2uhvs1PKJhCE1l0/iIs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=boJg/eheVRTIbXFz5BT67QOoaAmYGXO7jgNC4cum3hVfxjVDx75iWuqXWmTGz3NgG EZbTo9BAQ9Sc0AlkP/61Wgmm/oZendYf2w7hhqtmN9FYPT6XI574M9NlIA5NcfoMSy yZn56vytnqs1oSZNMW8qLvhf+SddWxe4436YdaCQ=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYPFAGISC5IWVA43ZN3KDFRLEVBNHHBYVUFKY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945/517518194@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d439895acfcf_258a3f8595acd960158192"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/YVdqQRUlt-p12NUg0PMhJbMVp78>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 01:57:44 -0000

I discussed this with @nharper and @DavidSchinazi today and I think we concluded placing it in transport parameters would be simpler than EE.  I'm happy to do it there and that would make it required(or if it's not present, it's clear the peer is fine with the defaults).

If so, the H3 feature negotiation would work identically to the QUIC transport feature negotiation, so reasoning about it should be straightforward.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945#issuecomment-517518194