IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/wg-materials] Update minutes.md (#77)

Alexandre Ferrieux <notifications@github.com> Wed, 26 September 2018 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835481274D0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7r3rY3QQwKY6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356AF126CC7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:51:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1537991504; bh=Q22245QVuVhGUDk7HqGijWs0JlNuZLR9aHzB5WRwbuE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YYGj1tUDQMEhAyn0Gz/39UvgzVdktQwUpPtIS92lTPdCuraot54hG8axCtcJVw0l3 lyhXxWqrnofaOOgeD0Gp9GgqcaorL0Li8CyNFRRYBWqbbX3zYSyFHsETaJdwvm+BFH KmNH4Gn5PjY/Ty+o89QhgcFgCOHkyWASHCWltEyQ=
From: Alexandre Ferrieux <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/wg-materials <reply+0166e4ab9c4df627cb1ac0d10c2f2013f9daa670ac3f371292cf0000000117c3a55092a169ce15b4a7cd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/wg-materials <wg-materials@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/wg-materials/pull/77/review/159170141@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/wg-materials/pull/77@github.com>
References: <quicwg/wg-materials/pull/77@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/wg-materials] Update minutes.md (#77)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5babe3505a7c2_e013f83cc8d45c02502c9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ferrieux
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/YWrb-XwQufBzQiKQ2nLJLJ8U3KU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:51:48 -0000

ferrieux commented on this pull request.



> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Demonstration of the spin bit graph
 
 Discussion of the graphs -- these just show the output of the spin bit measurement, but they don’t compare to any ground truth
 
-Orange is experimenting with three bits, but QUIC has only done privacy analysis of the single Spin Bit. That privacy analysis was done by a design team and then accepted by the working group - the other two bits must also be analyzed and accepted in order to go forward. 
+Orange is experimenting with three bits (spin bit for RTT + two bits for segmental loss), but QUIC has only done privacy analysis of the single Spin Bit. That privacy analysis was done by a design team and then accepted by the working group - the other two bits must also be analyzed and accepted in order to go forward (kinda chicken-and-egg, right ?)

Yes, an aside meant to convey 1% of the frustration that the remark prompted. Guess I have no choice. Edited out.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/pull/77#discussion_r220700589

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status