Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 06:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95D012075C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TP_zwPtv38Fb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BED12075A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 23:20:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554790847; bh=4dvMKH4d4a4vzKt91WQJPB5Q+XxTwuRiTN0He6h6eyw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nIgEYVKW7bFt2rkn0b0yaqH3USSjHjrvaRj5IbteoaBP6ChQbxFIPB0TxKxZv6eSM GXAGiCEYg3dUvBMUOc+mYhouYFN1TEdFV/w0Inxd7xKb7EDd0Cxu0KoSdEiDuBknKL MT2E1bVxksl+0lpEbA+fvSU2TEB6tbPJovApqjZk=
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4c10dc268600f176f4be4abc06c0825923be805192cf0000000118c3fbbf92a169ce196a996c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2564/review/224208609@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2564@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2564@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cac39bfe175f_2ec3ffcde8d45bc279983"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Yv66uODaytD3_85uX2GVlZqBSYc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:20:52 -0000
larseggert requested changes on this pull request. > @@ -3932,6 +3938,58 @@ version-independent. The remaining fields are specific to the selected QUIC version. See {{QUIC-INVARIANTS}} for details on how packets from different versions of QUIC are interpreted. +### Latency Spin Bit {#spin-bit} + +The latency spin bit enables passive latency monitoring from observation points +on the network path throughout the duration of a connection. The spin bit is +only present in the short packet header, since it is possible to measure the +initial RTT of a connection by observing the handshake. Therefore, the spin bit +is available after version negotiation and connection establishment are +completed. On-path measurement and use of the latency spin bit is further +discussed in {{QUIC-MANAGEABILITY}}. + +The spin bit is an OPTIONAL feature of QUIC. A QUIC stack that chooses to +support the spin bit MUST implement it as specified in this document. document -> section > +The latency spin bit enables passive latency monitoring from observation points +on the network path throughout the duration of a connection. The spin bit is +only present in the short packet header, since it is possible to measure the +initial RTT of a connection by observing the handshake. Therefore, the spin bit +is available after version negotiation and connection establishment are +completed. On-path measurement and use of the latency spin bit is further +discussed in {{QUIC-MANAGEABILITY}}. + +The spin bit is an OPTIONAL feature of QUIC. A QUIC stack that chooses to +support the spin bit MUST implement it as specified in this document. + +Each endpoint unilaterally decides if the spin bit is enabled or disabled for a +connection. Implementations MUST allow administrators of clients and servers +to disable the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis. Even when +the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator implementations MUST disable +the spin bit on a randomly chosen fraction of connections. The random selection on a randomly chosen fraction of connections -> for a given connection with a certain likelihood > +only present in the short packet header, since it is possible to measure the +initial RTT of a connection by observing the handshake. Therefore, the spin bit +is available after version negotiation and connection establishment are +completed. On-path measurement and use of the latency spin bit is further +discussed in {{QUIC-MANAGEABILITY}}. + +The spin bit is an OPTIONAL feature of QUIC. A QUIC stack that chooses to +support the spin bit MUST implement it as specified in this document. + +Each endpoint unilaterally decides if the spin bit is enabled or disabled for a +connection. Implementations MUST allow administrators of clients and servers +to disable the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis. Even when +the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator implementations MUST disable +the spin bit on a randomly chosen fraction of connections. The random selection +process SHOULD be designed such that on average the spin bit is disabled for at +least one eighth of network paths. The selection process should be externally Is it 1/8th of *paths*? I thought it was supposed to be 1/8th of *connections*? (Related to @mirjak's comment below.) > +to disable the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis. Even when +the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator implementations MUST disable +the spin bit on a randomly chosen fraction of connections. The random selection +process SHOULD be designed such that on average the spin bit is disabled for at +least one eighth of network paths. The selection process should be externally +unpredictable but consistent for any given combination of source and destination +address and port. The selection process performed at the beginning of the +connection SHOULD be applied for all paths used by the connection. + +In case multiple connections share the same five-tuple, i.e. same source and +destination IP address and UDP port the setting of the spin bit needs to be +coordinated across all connections to ensure a clear signal to any on path +measurement point, however that might not be feasible. + +When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints MAY set the spin bit to any value, and +MUST accept any incoming value. It is RECOMMENDED that they set the spin bit to accept -> ignore -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2564#pullrequestreview-224208609
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564) Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2… Martin Thomson