Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instead of 1 (#3586)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 May 2020 22:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0513A0C1E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id opT3pxHomBXR for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83AEB3A0C0A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-943b171.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-943b171.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6A56A07DC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588719565; bh=qslnopnMC7cnbUAUWd9fxoFv1Kx2SXfhmhSNdxO+jpM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1/r9jw7htsq7RrZVMX64Oap1TNZWuG/mfwvDpL2btDAXH6aPvbFv9iOhAU4EbWBG9 W5qDSBL9gLEssAyD76R5hmQ9miVOrm1/+PI5L1Ex6bIXZSOpXmbzf9xqLDZmMyGvB6 ejX+7mb/CGEEs7oEBxQZle99F5Ee443bNtg06frc=
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 15:59:25 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZPKUOYJ3POCZFWPYF4XXIM3EVBNHHCH3TLYY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3586/review/406212179@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3586@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3586@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instead of 1 (#3586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb1efcdbedf7_23093fbbe32cd95c2084d9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZG0wUXCAstMg_XEHy1wvhxhWz7E>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 22:59:28 -0000
@janaiyengar commented on this pull request. > +a single packet sent with that window causes the sender to waiting for a PTO +({{pto}}) to recover from that loss, which is much longer than a round trip. ```suggestion that single packet means that the sender needs to waiting for a PTO ({{pto}}) to recover, which can be much longer than a round-trip time. ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3586#pullrequestreview-406212179
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instead of… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why min CWND of 2 instea… ianswett