IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Sun, 18 March 2018 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8FB12D869 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TAjhkXnVmCtO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D041241F8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:29:15 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1521415755; bh=jvCv9QXF7Sxh//SOax5NwdEEUbFybKvPJ2T+TtuI68A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ywZ5uBaBi0x3DFN/fXh01Rrb8iZ5QhUctNuelXV8J7wzzn2A+KJWEbbHU6f5ITSd2 f7RE2tgqJLHuozrXHfIbKDCBdUJGppl09udIAOjIj03rAmZWQOC0N3gIVlzoDgh8sn Z1+M/MUUsAgBH/V89aOQQHH9sDnvczjATRavMgxc=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcf2846ce411e3101d010da9b96e0050a19e9d1b292cf0000000116c6b84b92a169ce1241ad3b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233/374066406@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aaef64b38077_43d2b2167e52ec416709a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZZn1429EknA56xqF0qaMQlbGyEY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:29:17 -0000

It depends - the frame type may help to decide between different CID's which helps lookup and reduce conflicts - but I'm not sure it is an issue in this direction.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233#issuecomment-374066406

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status