Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:39:11 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+AFTOJK3PT6OYT43BCVVSED54RHYQ7EVBNHHCGDM7NY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546/605036118@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PTO probes are sent too frequently (#3546)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7e100f482c1_59a43fbfebccd964545a2";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZdrYKX6uEgVoQlfa0Nfw7DqmskI>


----==_mimepart_5e7e100f482c1_59a43fbfebccd964545a2
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry if I was unclear, I meant not resetting PTO timer when the client receives an Initial packet. Assuming that the server sends only a few (most likely one), I do not think not resetting is fine.

Note that in case the server is going to send a fair number of Initial packets (e.g., post quantum) it should be sending a retry regardless of what we decide here, as relying on CC wold be better than relying on 3x limit.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546#issuecomment-605036118
----==_mimepart_5e7e100f482c1_59a43fbfebccd964545a2
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p></p>
<p>Sorry if I was unclear, I meant not resetting PTO timer when the client receives an Initial packet. Assuming that the server sends only a few (most likely one), I do not think not resetting is fine.</p>
<p>Note that in case the server is going to send a fair number of Initial packets (e.g., post quantum) it should be sending a retry regardless of what we decide here, as relying on CC wold be better than relying on 3x limit.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546#issuecomment-605036118">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTOJK4AARNDBQUDO3OHTFTRJS3A7ANCNFSM4LT4F2OA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AFTOJK64S5Z7DKOYIGC2Y7LRJS3A7A5CNFSM4LT4F2OKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEQIB4VQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546#issuecomment-605036118",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3546#issuecomment-605036118",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5e7e100f482c1_59a43fbfebccd964545a2--