Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:43:12 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/353/283529953@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/353@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/353@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Replace CONNECTION_CLOSE with Public Reset
 (#353)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_58b778b0675d_63a53f8645753c3487966";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Zx87SxmfsEczyjcCTbesOA7_JKA>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org

----==_mimepart_58b778b0675d_63a53f8645753c3487966
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't understand "Also, it means that a server that wants to permit retries would have to send two packets: a GOAWAY packet in addition to the Public Reset."

Today a server has to send a GOAWAY and a CONNECTION_CLOSE, so it seems equivalent?

But yes, I think the only concern is that the error code could be a privacy leak of some sort.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/353#issuecomment-283529953
----==_mimepart_58b778b0675d_63a53f8645753c3487966
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>I don't understand "Also, it means that a server that wants to permit re=
tries would have to send two packets: a GOAWAY packet in addition to the Pu=
blic Reset."</p>
<p>Today a server has to send a GOAWAY and a CONNECTION_CLOSE, so it seems =
equivalent?</p>
<p>But yes, I think the only concern is that the error code could be a priv=
acy leak of some sort.</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mda=
sh;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<=
br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/bas=
e-drafts/issues/353#issuecomment-283529953">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a hr=
ef=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq_-c3768PJkh4gt=
GmljVN734H4dLks5rhh6wgaJpZM4MQZqy">mute the thread</a>.<img alt=3D"" height=
=3D"1" src=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq3bh04D971BZSdy0q=
OX7VtYZ5pG9ks5rhh6wgaJpZM4MQZqy.gif" width=3D"1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop=3D"action" itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/ViewAction=
">
  <link itemprop=3D"url" href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issu=
es/353#issuecomment-283529953"></link>
  <meta itemprop=3D"name" content=3D"View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop=3D"description" content=3D"View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_version"=
:"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"Gi=
tHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg=
/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://clou=
d.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290=
892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/asset=
s/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name=
":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates=
":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@ianswett in #353: I don't under=
stand \"Also, it means that a server that wants to permit retries would hav=
e to send two packets: a GOAWAY packet in addition to the Public Reset.\"\r=
\n\r\nToday a server has to send a GOAWAY and a CONNECTION_CLOSE, so it see=
ms equivalent?\r\n\r\nBut yes, I think the only concern is that the error c=
ode could be a privacy leak of some sort."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue",=
"url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/353#issuecomment-283529=
953"}}}</script>=

----==_mimepart_58b778b0675d_63a53f8645753c3487966--