Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] renamed max_packet_size to max_udp_size (#3473)

MikkelFJ <> Sat, 22 February 2020 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D34120074 for <>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaXjkzGn2RS3 for <>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8667F12006D for <>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:29:19 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1582367359; bh=gQtGZZWSqOby7lkmmF/wil8+IDx/41LHsrqQJQpd0uY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mV5W1CbNCMQAAoCMpaQQLSGtkWp5nmCRM9OVB1uuAJp8thmkJignsx4sVuxVxvEKP NztFeNEXOKfY2fVGAzqyDS0L01Gym75zYiGGpXQexvHA5yBEn05QFS/cZllQEk0sqP A6lRYgF5QtpJ3WkV6HA4YiiJ+MhzREB5+intAp70=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3473/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] renamed max_packet_size to max_udp_size (#3473)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e51027f4892a_3e993fe7a7ccd96c125990"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:29:22 -0000

I realize QUIC is fairly tied to UDP, notably in all transport text. But if you want to modify QUIC to run over a separate channel like over a bluetooth bus, would you then invent a new transport parameter for that, or would packet size be the right choice? If so, renaming to UDP might have some consequences.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: