Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use "Insert Count" rather than "Largest Reference" (#2111)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 31 December 2018 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F9F12EB11 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:00:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYWXGEWxBCJ2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E3112008A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:00:02 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1546221602; bh=Fk3UrL9lgF4rNF93OrSziIM8l/kLP5kNJu0/l7WdJFQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=U9Kadd08Si4FLGoi9O0dV2b6LJPsep+NFYCo/QaPl2IRo5MQ4Pzw52rOBf7/EnhIg m5ENAVr3k/+5JxeogFbnPo5pofGmB3wLhVoalADwLUCngGYlWRZ8e73Xv2dpg5QOsX Gehy8ky/OhdE5czue2cCy1oryTTlJPshPpOFF2fU=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5d7a752c8c56945e56947ec8592d7281c8431d8892cf0000000118413a2292a169ce17392ee3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2111/review/188456171@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2111@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2111@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use "Insert Count" rather than "Largest Reference" (#2111)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c297822bdb78_783e3ffcd16d45bc98225d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_6YTTNHRG9SB_lKjtYU2_5b8zCk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 02:00:07 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.

Thanks for the comments @bencebeky.

I think that this needs to change absolute indexing to 0-based to be consistent.  That makes everything else better.

> @@ -249,18 +250,19 @@ Because QUIC does not guarantee order between data on different streams, a
 header block might reference an entry in the dynamic table that has not yet been
 received.
 
-Each header block contains a Largest Reference ({{header-prefix}}) which
-identifies the table state necessary for decoding. If the greatest absolute
-index in the dynamic table is less than the value of the Largest Reference, the
-stream is considered "blocked."  While blocked, header field data SHOULD remain
-in the blocked stream's flow control window.  When the Largest Reference is
-zero, the frame contains no references to the dynamic table and can always be
-processed immediately. A stream becomes unblocked when the greatest absolute
-index in the dynamic table becomes greater than or equal to the Largest
-Reference for all header blocks the decoder has started reading from the stream.
-If the decoder encounters a header block where the actual largest reference is
-not equal to the Largest Reference declared in the prefix, it MAY treat this as
-a stream error of type HTTP_QPACK_DECOMPRESSION_FAILED.
+Each header block contains the total number of entries added to the dynamic

Thanks, that prompted me to restructure this (massive) paragraph.

> -index in the dynamic table becomes greater than or equal to the Largest
-Reference for all header blocks the decoder has started reading from the stream.
-If the decoder encounters a header block where the actual largest reference is
-not equal to the Largest Reference declared in the prefix, it MAY treat this as
-a stream error of type HTTP_QPACK_DECOMPRESSION_FAILED.
+Each header block contains the total number of entries added to the dynamic
+table - the Required Insert Count - which identifies the table state necessary
+for decoding (see {{header-prefix}}). If the Required Insert Count is greater
+than the number of dynamic table entries received, the stream is considered
+"blocked."  While blocked, header field data SHOULD remain in the blocked
+stream's flow control window.  When the Required Insert Count is zero, the frame
+contains no references to the dynamic table and can always be processed
+immediately. A stream becomes unblocked when the number of entries inserted in
+the dynamic table becomes greater than or equal to the Required Insert Count for
+all header blocks the decoder has started reading from the stream.  If the
+decoder encounters a header block where the largest Absolute Index used not

I think that I'm OK with this as is.  Repeating the requirement is OK if that requirement is tricky.

>  
 n = count of entries inserted
 d = count of entries dropped
 ~~~~~
 {: title="Example Dynamic Table Indexing - Control Stream"}
 
 Because frames from request streams can be delivered out of order with
-instructions on the encoder stream, relative indices are relative to the Base
-Index at the beginning of the header block (see {{header-prefix}}). The Base
-Index is an absolute index. When interpreting the rest of the frame, the entry
-identified by Base Index has a relative index of zero.  The relative indices of
-entries do not change while interpreting headers on a request or push stream.
+instructions on the encoder stream, relative indices are relative to the Base at
+the beginning of the header block (see {{header-prefix}}). The Base is encoded

Thanks.  That's better.

> @@ -784,29 +798,29 @@ streams emit the headers for an HTTP request or response.
 
 ### Header Data Prefix {#header-prefix}
 
-Header data is prefixed with two integers, `Largest Reference` and `Base Index`.
+Header data is prefixed with two integers, `Required Insert Count` and `Base`.

Yeah, that is a good idea.  The prose here was a little light.

>  
 ~~~~~~~~~~  drawing
   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
-|     Largest Reference (8+)    |
+|   Required Insert Count (8+)  |

I think that I'll stick with Required Insert Count at this level.

>  +---+---------------------------+
 |      Compressed Headers     ...
 +-------------------------------+
 ~~~~~~~~~~
 {:#fig-base-index title="Frame Payload"}
 
-#### Largest Reference
+#### Insert Count

Done.  Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2111#pullrequestreview-188456171