Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)

Alexandre Ferrieux <> Wed, 06 November 2019 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D3F12089D for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:51:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bjEH66TnP80 for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C185012089E for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:51:42 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573048303; bh=GsjXlbU5FiV2WwEVCYFkcTWal9Ye4hW3DjQFdVI34zY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jUAOSfw/HKz1SDN2u3nKgJgHZp5Kx/GzgQMv5kAM2wHjz89aExDT4bE56BR5vDYtW bX6bboL+0FckVmgvuU1LdqP7O3lWdWMRwDLJEUgyrOsb3SHbfPM0SJEqRNYRsKTsAN Wj/m71Q27iBPxsVz3wk9O89a2sjwchn3DgE3e5zo=
From: Alexandre Ferrieux <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc2cfeef29b8_15d13fbe016cd960190191"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ferrieux
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:51:45 -0000

@mnot :
While this indeed is not new (as in "heavily validated in the field"), we are stepping forth to provide the "last" element that you've been requesting: a manifestation of support from the industry. Here is a list of players who have expressed support so far:
 - Orange
 - Akamai
 - CNES(Satcom)
 - Telefonica
 - British Telecom
 - Microsoft
The list is growing daily. Shipping v1 without loss observation support would undermine daily network maintenance work in at least that part of the ecosystem.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: