IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe the two processes. (9f6e285)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79219128766 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:25:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYpZDPs8mpRy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C4E126F72 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:25:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=/EThUvZuixOby9DPWH/DuCqgowE=; b=ALLzOBfB3jHvl0UK zwWtAsgtVR4tQ7c2g5PPCZ0S+tL+yvOo7pEK2t8yyJHxuXBTntMJ8URwu7mAVA2I Hs4mMAI/6Otq4rpGSfljbPck9a7IPoucUKx5MrKMh4pmjf0ZMDhK8Yn1AEguJhnX HkEo+t9jp8nO3LpevtMU0cBoMXo=
Received: by filter0841p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0841p1las1-9483-5C6193D7-4B 2019-02-11 15:25:12.016727487 +0000 UTC m=+501645.230118849
Received: from github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.40]) by ismtpd0027p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id NRg5A7eJTDazoCoANrt3oA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:25:11.777 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C1340004B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:25:12 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab073f315b98cdf29be4ccc917c86e26e1c46d8d7692cf00000001187955d792a163ce01ec66cb@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/9f6e285ad51c3439d5abd0ba24ad4ecd081c7a25/32270027@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/9f6e285ad51c3439d5abd0ba24ad4ecd081c7a25@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/9f6e285ad51c3439d5abd0ba24ad4ecd081c7a25@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe the two processes. (9f6e285)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c6193d7b5b9d_ede3febf3ad45c027608b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2ZtG0H428JxKuWcMNgV4fhC9GHyL2Quut0vH t1ZDdXvr0DLqz/wllVyEkEyUic3o5U099E/EAU2NjyJhhtXxtqO+GJwASWTJj08xaliJCvSZQfvjOL GkkCjir4FwD2uR8s5TWMTHvQkPl7+fvon0+RsvVZf0frEzXJpBY26Zr4NQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_6xResRY90SFzh1lUQtWZpyeQ8U>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:25:14 -0000

So either editors or chairs can merge PRs once the 'has-consensus' label is present?  Or should the chairs just do the merging when they add the label?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/9f6e285ad51c3439d5abd0ba24ad4ecd081c7a25#commitcomment-32270027

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email