IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)

Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728B11242F7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:37:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjMDN6kKIweI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1F7120724 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:37:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=NzflmBR3IjXPHagqePi6qTXYy7E=; b=rbZEFSUcNuX4KXDJ lH3pLsQYFaNK+VdWUYYmNNJ8zxT4jY/CfIz3mt9tknMu+mSXu5lVLh+iqpr2YQgI kU6+9vyTSYE0rt0x3SZGceOEjBFGO+6F9oD/CuxTxRqR+lXA569Tj4Fki6ZCzF5D CnP9vrXVHg64TAfrDkY/gEWLSn8=
Received: by filter0174p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0174p1las1-31976-5A1EB807-25 2017-11-29 13:37:11.551413914 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id RwjtLAHNTyGHXa2-HIGaJw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:37:11.487 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:37:11 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1b2415c06b8e787ec93d3df44f3f7c79f6ca97bd92cf0000000116367a0792a169ce1075d33e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956/c347862270@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a1eb8075d6be_91b3f9bccd80f341064756"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: csperkins
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3EkX20mp9OpA5C1TF0w69LOPrnRTj1Q9kv4+ lU5n4NZJgye1AKfSMcbT58uf1Al32wahyDrXwKiZfoBWKNy+z+sIpVUlWTRunurjBzW1C8MQdLwqz3 g2jFEh6Re1QeF3S23SDWfERP2c1dndFgEUd9uHQn3SsWUz2+d9koUXojQ5kzTycXaia1VZ8gHA+c2Z A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_DX3rbm8Nn8VliwhTO7O9AF5kGY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:37:14 -0000

> It's possible that we can still grease even for cases where multiplexing with RTP is desired, we just might multiplex less. 

When multiplexing, don’t grease the ranges being used by the protocols that you’re multiplexing with. You’re already exercising the ability to send packets using those bits.

> Would it help if I wrote up what I am considering specifying for greasing?

Likely, yes

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956#issuecomment-347862270

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status