Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)

martinduke <> Fri, 08 February 2019 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056EC130F2A for <>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:01:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rLMfowZhOckU for <>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D3E130F25 for <>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:01:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1549605706; bh=SANkTkq45K0/1MASt9kpj41iy1vFFL+LAyXBayd+wv8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=eVkjI77hoQOykacPOwctZ4kVECX8a7hk1lhB+BsvmEDZAzmPd4i4To68YlaEj5YCx psqONekeNCN7dDMOTzuHG9AEF02zcHdqc+ms5GrKIqHIUBevZQ9QpU8INsjhniSvMK CEq1Al7iRTLmedTaMeMAxMCmJCh1V7EOHUcAlaZc=
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5d1b4a2a5a6_52b83f9bec4d45b41138a4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 06:01:49 -0000

To me, it's clear that we should either (1) add it to the invariants or (2) bring it under header protection for server-generated packets only. (2) is somewhat inelegant, but we get to keep using the bits. Are there any privacy implications to there being a "client bit"?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: