Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connection or what? (#2180)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 31 January 2019 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6D1130F96 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MkB8t3roXDV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4932130FD4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:16 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548972316; bh=Uk49XgdNX8KBJKZ+zgdQ+TcW6LKYFHUQuqoAOr8k+ZU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mfGidtRgl4wq52IJQwZAHJFgoiVYN0/AYhnh1NIp1R0b5SvsfTyvuc7uKf6o+oi55 3uTXIiNgozP9NqKuM2PNBjCnBB244z049iEATneJl5aI4iLWO3qkxwycNoQn0dKQjf fbhzJmVdjG9RMtCHMOudxgEpzhpU4FC0lDRi9K2A=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab127aa3c49d1d4badd06786b0c98b98db011790ec92cf00000001186b331c92a169ce174d10b9@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2180/459524221@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2180@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2180@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connection or what? (#2180)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c53711c6fee3_40be3f96c3cd45bc62865"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_Z5qbQVS4HXZE0krcnRySnnRePk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 22:05:24 -0000
IIUC, we are going to require the Hello to be the same and to not reset the PN when receiving a Retry. Assuming that is true, do we need to keep the statement that says that the server CID "MUST not be equal to the Destination Connection ID field of the packet sent by the client"? I think we can remove it now (for simplicity). See also: #2179 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2180#issuecomment-459524221
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connection or… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is Retry a new connectio… Martin Thomson