IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC advertisement description (#87)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Thu, 26 January 2017 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D95A129452 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:49:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCl8R8W-4IEm for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB45129451 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:49:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=s6kXjdbGD6BWBBBEWVC2WLLzeqE=; b=kca4yUKxfSSahWFO V5tudUMXW1VISEKNThm90xeHbPFXZ4FStgyy+997Kag7QVIJiqtEvsEXQsAfoe2J 0ivBvw/MGmn9xdpLDRgJE1tPqeoPvg1kVDf9ZU0B/pgwg2T95GFhhdVWFEYpYql6 MKWlwP/H6M82pqJQO7mp47ED0x0=
Received: by filter0459p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0459p1mdw1-10658-588971D6-1 2017-01-26 03:49:42.01877406 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id S7jMO1adTEmJ0LhfOyX6_g for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:49:41.974 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:49:41 -0800
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/87/275302052@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/87@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/87@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC advertisement description (#87)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_588971d5da233_6dd23fdec2e1f13c279b9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0qPJBvXq/iz7/fYUp2vlkOHvR4C5HU/0k+VG 2Mr+66PuRLULaZKjLtU5JLeTqRRasjqe9+uByPokvNZtAfkPcK1RXAEmq0o0QxkLMDQB/xvDC5noEM EJPBQH8QBdZa3zdc9tTjIY7LjB8sgW4DNEyQsw4P0YsdF5LQjDGi+eyxCCFW03wZIwLPUen5PKTDG5 I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_jQCGwzG6nnwftbZrdZfTQu4fSU>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:49:45 -0000

I have two minor comments about the text added to address this original issue:

1. The "optionality" of quic= parameter. I inferred this parameter is optional (Mike supported that in discussion), would it help to make a more explicit comment? Something like "absence of the quic parameter indicates the server has no preference to the QUIC version".

2. The language of the whole section speaks in the context of a server advertising HTTP/QUIC for itself, rather than an origin advertising an alternate service on a different host. Am I missing something here? Perhaps it would help to loosen the language a little?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/87#issuecomment-275302052

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status