Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)

Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com> Sun, 17 November 2019 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186BD120100 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:45:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BvLW43ZhMsi8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73C81200CD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:45:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.55]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E2BA003A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:45:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1573998315; bh=WPD96qE/+1bJJkamZ2dXNsz/outX2ZIppaXBnp3S6ME=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1uKj86Z73lx4ZJzHj1s550PnANtPpyd//IGU0iWq11rlcOljCATqt9/wbaoT2dDyG DecPZyPm+uR8bd2+VvYIEllT1CJrexzvxn8hlRnN4WL3vl5r6BUr671lWM5WSKP5y4 E0eKWGiGuPzRIEEPh87b10g5YfBisOJHb8XsXkis=
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:45:15 -0800
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4XEB534PZEVBM7UXN332AWXEVBNHHB4VEL2Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122/554747138@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd14eeb372a5_4c63fca280cd96013500f1"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pravb
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_pGnMQZ26qwmd7T9xVkM3FEBYyE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:45:17 -0000

I agree. I found this reference pretty odd and it could become dated in time. I don't think we need to refer implementers to any particular implementation. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122#issuecomment-554747138