IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add EXTENSION frame (#1068)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE881200E5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 05:39:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7p5rgW887xiL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 05:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4E0120724 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 05:39:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=tCU6KAqA2Qk5rGlKgBCyhVhl+7s=; b=XOMFoAm8l3O6jOgn SilU2jh1R6OY642jtAWgM4d/dOZEyk6EkHJP7YQHTXTwNcPlyNmUFtsUZmoJew5b IACca4qiCiioKPGD4JnErvBBHJeM8iilv45QVOqt1ELFCGV+3ADd9h7juXVdCA/a ROOcrVYWJlOweLIo8v/11CUY44k=
Received: by filter0514p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0514p1iad2-7683-5A69DE04-29 2018-01-25 13:39:16.65446143 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0007p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id GQZrsdsDQ_6x3dR_FciRBw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:39:16.159 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:39:16 +0000
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abded20654296bd245f8599bf86bf7fb062049808892cf000000011681a00392a169ce115ea54e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068/c360468844@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add EXTENSION frame (#1068)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a69de03b1bd5_64963fb03289af2c45909"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1+VktpRjh60Wd5YLVxXkNbsdHvAmzpwTUwGA bv/gOU8NUtqdqZzg2xAhHcvsMVQRAZ/Y4ZepBjOmGtQMdqI+mk3sg2mkA61OH4JrAcfaCMvFaHpOXW GWuLI8T2JwsCtNr/fvjCn9aSz7yYvP/DnStJo3tXLZwrWzqgXFxlkXuI0Q==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_rgbtl_o3mv6k7XuY8PR-r0dBLM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:39:19 -0000

So why don't we just say that all frames types that are not used in this spec for this version are experimental (and all have to have a length field when used) and one can directly register a new frame type for a certain version of QUIC. I mean there is nothing else we can do with the remaining frame types as soon as the version spec is completed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068#issuecomment-360468844

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status