Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Editorial suggestions on the Streams section (#2730)

MikkelFJ <> Wed, 19 June 2019 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CD8120342 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UP62W_tYSr8S for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6848E1201E4 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:32:35 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560925955; bh=Ez0IZV2G1K+tNkx3q+U9qlXvxdl7hNhDsmAI3/Xqjes=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=HujtwNeIsvWjEy8nhGUSjRkBUY0+Ua2MbVmHgEB8AewVm0B1CuXyl98/W/fWloysY pHaxB2sKRjhyao7fW20OYIucusyhmeBKP8RCURAC7UL5l1WCLdELgHbXJuxHrok/ow rxRqG+LDZjEqVew7PVgi3n7AYs0P7YupWt/mT4gM=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2730/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Editorial suggestions on the Streams section (#2730)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d09d703e4857_7d473f82188cd960960ad"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:32:40 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> @@ -335,8 +337,9 @@ the flow control limits set by its peer.  Flow control is described in detail in
 Stream multiplexing can have a significant effect on application performance if
 resources allocated to streams are correctly prioritized.
-QUIC does not provide frames for exchanging prioritization information.  Instead
-it relies on receiving priority information from the application that uses QUIC.
+QUIC does not provide a mechanism for exchanging prioritization information.
+Instead it relies on receiving priority information from the application that
+uses QUIC.

uses QUIC in an implementation specific manner.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: