Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C108E12004A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYzCtxXRYQtI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BD0120049 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:42:46 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554093766; bh=93Ei6lQSw/uyOMNFy4vGKofHXM5PQKD0lLI/k7OqVsc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZNTvH5G2cJM7LCW2X2x266FIlzht/2dyLmsL8Z0Yc9ShLusjNTJoElT/6ITAs5JLW 7ApcJAyOCIog6AwfVxZcfvN4LAoLjwtxCgV71jpXTOdoXbxfarvJy6cuMXVQF0VsSh Hu95B+R3wcBT2PgGwu/I5/PRsUldaz6Dr8zT8KkI=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7f8ac9b378a8fa42d6d34df15b5e3148b8b6314292cf0000000118b958c692a169ce197ad4b9@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573/c478433519@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca196c6e5db8_4b193fadb90d45c051669a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/a0HN6a2Uj4a75AtlTL3dW0HU-rk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:42:50 -0000

Interesting, but middleboxes can scan for known unsalted versions and block some of these. This effectively stops these versions because salting isn’t reliable. Furthermore a middlebox can drop any initial packet it doesn’t understand to force unsalted version on retry.

It can still work for less aggressive middleboxes, but perhaps it is better to wait for the fully encrypted solution Kazuho and Huitema has been working on.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573#issuecomment-478433519