IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#105)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Wed, 28 December 2016 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189D129660 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:52:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id negZi0PMhIyg for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D058D12965F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:52:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=0oD1kfxzBZivLgHdXJuwEYOcatc=; b=o0OqiPSmJbwkWqKL WMNzv7lkUiyOeNRfpe3m/3BK30D5lWFHMsE5uAwcieiLk2ZzasMF3sVSsPA9FGMm +Di2f4U0cWo6NZGrJ+LuCC6If3xH/ZJITsLHDeZQYUlxa7B0mq8zr0NcB1ANB0o6 swcxCdtsnfQY4Q61zlxXGLJVnA0=
Received: by filter0849p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0849p1mdw1-30237-586417FD-65 2016-12-28 19:52:29.691810316 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id g6MYisGSR6GXc_0wZ-BRPQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:52:29.638 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:52:29 -0800
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#105)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_586417fd88185_72a83f8473a2713c3019f4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1nWeUxoiUMFnXbOcvhzgFWTIH2MYRtwvYBGx dkNrHYaejSf/ELn+KmLjI3N/Tm9xDRMDG5yjtUxPXPEyv7JtrKBByfovXWqegPQGUhSB62UjrStsir gF0+mDKgM3mrSsgQi6rpPSVAtCyXimnthKGfRznoAq9X7hS4ymOZ7lECmPMg+dU/pNClhLcOh83gRQ 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/a4HbHMME5wU3N2OnTHqH9MBeJJk>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:52:32 -0000

Here is an alternate solution to he PMTUD section as discussed in Issue #64
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/64

I think it is much cleaner and clearer about what to do. It assumes that ICMP black holes are not a huge problem in the internet, and that no one is using a UDP socket API that prevents them from stopping various noncompliant behaviors. I much prefer this version, although some may find it too restrictive.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105

-- Commit Summary --

  * Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (93)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105.patch
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105

v2.38.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status