IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Finding frame lengths (#62)

Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC52129D67 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:02:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F0BsoY8exLci for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165A312947D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:02:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=1yktkfqtBIvBUU9u4DOpx8XMBWM=; b=rs/06k33VuKHTQ7i b5a92nqw0feOhm3sUQBS0DMxBsOxTSLnDGRdw+RUSzE83TJqK8aSf3KPqVqjOzQz EKS7oN4kgFavv6lDVzX5wd4MFFeJIuTE1Y8yG7TcUYwmJa5mfIVapLfaIjqv/WhQ 77Bx4OUllH9Y0DJyZHYLXbBD9mo=
Received: by filter0940p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0940p1mdw1-26647-589D0316-7A 2017-02-10 00:02:30.700241631 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id -TEZonnuQdyd4HTVSIDGSA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:02:30.674 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:02:30 -0800
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/62/278816880@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/62@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/62@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Finding frame lengths (#62)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_589d03168b789_22d23fc35742b13451957b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1sUXwj2LaMwldxmIwQ4geqBsqnuVMIhD0VDf hAEUlXou8+7XSmni0npI47DMCo1vooWnC2iepxc/6s0rvz6noIELO2Z295/eRoI/xDy1J1ooKnOd8t /ph3k4p8KIlZBCJAP2jxmV2bZo5RXVhKQR9SRN8xJ5HwEH32jqLBAm8CAFY4jPWwGrGkRORTccLgnq c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aJ-0fhkIbgd8uktdsKsPU3BumU0>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:02:35 -0000

I'm sure I'm just confused about how the process is expected to work. This is not terribly surprising :)

Do I understand you correctly that since this issue was discussed in Tokyo, no consensus from the list is needed? I'm sorry for being dense. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/62#issuecomment-278816880

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status