IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7E012000F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzqnMaLN5iI5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5478E120003 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:18:08 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554949088; bh=TckW5FsVG1AmVXdFT+7zI7zuecsoqC6vyn9RXhI7Mnw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nI8JWx3afaMIByIH5+Ja0BQ0tzZSEw1dllsV8Freb80CQGRi1ZaElxI6RKq4Fpx2U bZ7eYEByJ1N+NMRGUWX5LTRRrXvH0lwPL3Gi9VwENzty5YS/WuLV/mBRndcrNu5tTl pkI4F35UXLZ6Rd1UHFHK9y0ftQreXO9hRUzLyx0w=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf525277466db6bb012135693c41e4a639cb6c43892cebabbd66092a169ce195b61e0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555/481939041@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5caea3e095e5d_79243f8c35ad45c071411"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aNmFE2bXs-K9T7c3qIhPa7QzhwU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:18:11 -0000

Thanks for the discussion, I updated #2605 based on this, though I'm a bit concerned that SHOULD is too weak in regards to bursts into the network.  Then again, if that's what Windows is doing, maybe we have to accept the reality of current deployments?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555#issuecomment-481939041

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email