Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 19:51:53 -0700
From: Rui Paulo <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+AFTOJK774QQ3FCTOUYVTPKV3KYO4TEVBNHHBY4DNAQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954/c518476450@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify out of order acking (#2954)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5d48eb49abdc5_7db83f90358cd96c3342d8";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aQRJHupcKFkt5op-bF0YBLfgBhk>


----==_mimepart_5d48eb49abdc5_7db83f90358cd96c3342d8
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> What about the case where you receive an in order ack eliciting packet and then an out of order ack only packet? Should you still rely on delayed ack timer or send an ack immediately?

Yes, this was going to be my follow up question.

Also @janaiyengar what about the ECN paragraph just below it?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954#issuecomment-518476450
----==_mimepart_5d48eb49abdc5_7db83f90358cd96c3342d8
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<blockquote>
<p>What about the case where you receive an in order ack eliciting packet and then an out of order ack only packet? Should you still rely on delayed ack timer or send an ack immediately?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, this was going to be my follow up question.</p>
<p>Also <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=11067604" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/janaiyengar">@janaiyengar</a> what about the ECN paragraph just below it?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954?email_source=notifications&amp;email_token=AFTOJK3Y6DK6GEYXUNV3VA3QDDRMTA5CNFSM4IJQTFTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3TVFIQ#issuecomment-518476450">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTOJK34MP2FBN5E6CKVVGTQDDRMTANCNFSM4IJQTFTA">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AFTOJK3YYWERAZ4NICQDTCDQDDRMTA5CNFSM4IJQTFTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3TVFIQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK3Y6DK6GEYXUNV3VA3QDDRMTA5CNFSM4IJQTFTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3TVFIQ#issuecomment-518476450",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2954?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK3Y6DK6GEYXUNV3VA3QDDRMTA5CNFSM4IJQTFTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3TVFIQ#issuecomment-518476450",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5d48eb49abdc5_7db83f90358cd96c3342d8--