IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Finished be sent as 1-RTT data? (#785)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEF4133226 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id riMwK-TmRY43 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6555C132EC4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=S786uyl7BmgwDgbCnYoVSaQv4G4=; b=HZbO2JKkSTP28Zoq xQt8X0rZz0mutmukyTJTSbusVJLb96LtRmHL+A7/EUSYO+ih+anhyHzyd8aLL69O IOwspgY4ELhAB1dr3ed0evD0MSaxbzowyRx6eiuh6udB2Vso/0AUy+DtD2NRiM9N AFDOruRxqBwr+WyzMgfvmttdF0I=
Received: by filter0970p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0970p1mdw1-1533-59C8D2C6-28 2017-09-25 09:56:22.595422795 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0005p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id eOwg3fMhT0GUj_oij0qRrQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:56:22.762 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:56:22 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb382c3a13c5321bbf5620056a38cb96e8ac8980492cf0000000115e094c692a169ce0f7388f0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785/331834054@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Finished be sent as 1-RTT data? (#785)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59c8d2c6693a5_4be03f86e2324f802376a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1O/CTAMHNW4MTy3wXwTsIxTIiSvwzJR21OZD usXFnEL31bpy1qRF1F5oh10LtfKMfk73iprdKcm+SFtsvKkgYV6CQXslMvQKtnfqZoFocLVAEPoY45 Z2N//+CKg60kWv0KbZnKHcJgPu8R9VeVsQ5mBHvNALWAbYt/BZh+o7TAMVuSGZoKh4snPYG9kZWZvM U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aX-x763fHoS9GQJ0qSJhWDXT9jo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:56:26 -0000

I think that we would change the cleartext packet types instead.  Fewer moving parts that way.

As for the DOS opening, I get it.  You have shared keys now, but you aren't using them, at least to the extent that they are visible at the QUIC layer.  I think that more special rules might help here.  I hate special rules though.

As you say, there are two issues here.  Unfortunately, this particular issue is neither and probably should be closed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785#issuecomment-331834054

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status