Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:56:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4abb382c3a13c5321bbf5620056a38cb96e8ac8980492cf0000000115e094c692a169ce0f7388f0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785/331834054@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Finished be sent as 1-RTT data? (#785)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_59c8d2c6693a5_4be03f86e2324f802376a";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aX-x763fHoS9GQJ0qSJhWDXT9jo>

----==_mimepart_59c8d2c6693a5_4be03f86e2324f802376a
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think that we would change the cleartext packet types instead.  Fewer moving parts that way.

As for the DOS opening, I get it.  You have shared keys now, but you aren't using them, at least to the extent that they are visible at the QUIC layer.  I think that more special rules might help here.  I hate special rules though.

As you say, there are two issues here.  Unfortunately, this particular issue is neither and probably should be closed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/785#issuecomment-331834054
----==_mimepart_59c8d2c6693a5_4be03f86e2324f802376a
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>I think that we would change the cleartext packet types instead.  Fewer =
moving parts that way.</p>
<p>As for the DOS opening, I get it.  You have shared keys now, but you are=
n't using them, at least to the extent that they are visible at the QUIC la=
yer.  I think that more special rules might help here.  I hate special rule=
s though.</p>
<p>As you say, there are two issues here.  Unfortunately, this particular i=
ssue is neither and probably should be closed.</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mda=
sh;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<=
br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/bas=
e-drafts/issues/785#issuecomment-331834054">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a hr=
ef=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq67NL_0jBJHd6Hx=
mmlC3r1z9psZTks5sl3jGgaJpZM4PeKN8">mute the thread</a>.<img alt=3D"" height=
=3D"1" src=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkqz7vt6M2PHNX58VZ0=
U8fnhI9Iv7Oks5sl3jGgaJpZM4PeKN8.gif" width=3D"1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop=3D"action" itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/ViewAction=
">
  <link itemprop=3D"url" href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issu=
es/785#issuecomment-331834054"></link>
  <meta itemprop=3D"name" content=3D"View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop=3D"description" content=3D"View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_version"=
:"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"Gi=
tHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg=
/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://clou=
d.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290=
892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/asset=
s/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name=
":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates=
":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@martinthomson in #785: I think =
that we would change the cleartext packet types instead.  Fewer moving part=
s that way.\r\n\r\nAs for the DOS opening, I get it.  You have shared keys =
now, but you aren't using them, at least to the extent that they are visibl=
e at the QUIC layer.  I think that more special rules might help here.  I h=
ate special rules though.\r\n\r\nAs you say, there are two issues here.  Un=
fortunately, this particular issue is neither and probably should be closed=
."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr=
afts/issues/785#issuecomment-331834054"}}}</script>=

----==_mimepart_59c8d2c6693a5_4be03f86e2324f802376a--