Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 18 November 2019 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEDA12008A for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:33:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.455
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qu5TLsdbhbk6 for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D0212004C for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:33:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574047987; bh=EBHfRNzoWk7L5/qEcnCy574VkoO3jDZjg+o1qVyT1vE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=k3ko/+uXKLZlNXpKPFA0SeWDPLfUc0pB9YzF9ioGiql4Td1VlZQj3+rvIlb5VZzQ6 TZQIK+4ca5Gtpuo3we8PxORyogpK4kPfmCiccDsELN3hpjLkUTqPvnmLN9avpAZLq/ cpKOaVPKyNRVUz+lKoPwRI/NSci9CabDk099qrA8=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd210f3aa737_4ec53f8194ccd96891005f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 03:33:10 -0000

I'm sorry, I perhaps wasn't clear.  This is not stated as an issue.  "This document doesn't cite X" isn't an issue.  Is there something specific that is in RFC 8085 that is needed to address an issue?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: