Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#1404)
afrind <notifications@github.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 20:13 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C6F12D9FE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKuTxNhK4ixp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-11.smtp.github.com (out-11.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491B112D94A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:13:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1527883996; bh=2OHUE8HF9AmlVYYNjHBPDNxljKbCLxRijMAFEZ6aifU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Q2P6ryKEenLy/+f/sDmJ/WkNb6Md4xU1pCXcxqQRLQ7EfLsLRaB6qRTK2490ToSCE nN6OG3X8+BNObv+H4IvzjHKqeQkGf+JYJAn7frNUW1geHGXvbX5vlSsGgeOeuCBci+ m7V/5PvzyBUe+wneF6CAKf9AAzhg7GQQrLZgjAKE=
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe4d4c71d5973533d099cef55fdd5051f51be8bed92cf0000000117296adc92a169ce138cb60c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404/393996538@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#1404)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b11a8dc928b2_62093fe42911ef841031d1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aaTwNoSmZu8BEKXSnXIa_yvvu58>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:13:19 -0000
If tolerance of errors like this is a downward spiral, I guess I don't understand MAY instead of MUST. Then there will be some implementations that don't treat it as an error (perhaps many, because tracking this is annoying), and the buggy encoder can just say "well it works with so-and-so". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404#issuecomment-393996538
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind