Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recovery of delayed ack being 25ms does not seem to relate to anything (#3075)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF08120043 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnQCPNAGjP-h for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1229012002F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:11:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1570140688; bh=xO9SxnMwCcJl0eugX4JYACKVprnWx4Nl1bcTeoh8xmQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1h9ue0ExnKUNLrRfxaQDNOO/YnMU//uQnK2GInEiNeuZvZ4wuQfVlnQfAcmwsBOsD vg6pMzKXvLQSghYNO0+u2LgOMuGc/sgCUATlOmFF1BRyFq6ZQ0n0kNOjlrUZgJynTK lKhHfdItHP048AhPlRHqeZVzwYhTQGRIw6CBzdEs=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7TBU5OBJAQZC6Z43N3UOZKBEVBNHHB34GMIM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075/538148915@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recovery of delayed ack being 25ms does not seem to relate to anything (#3075)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9672102e81c_4fa33fe7b4acd95c1720ac"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/acq2i6Pe-nVom26aXAwSmNH2DX8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 22:11:31 -0000
Thanks for pointing this out. The intent was to explain why 25ms was chosen, given it's smaller than most TCP implementations default delayed ack time. There were more exceptions before, but now there's only the one, which makes the preceding paragraph awkward as well. "The majority of constants were derived from best common practices among widely deployed TCP implementations on the internet. Exceptions follow." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3075#issuecomment-538148915
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recovery … Johannes Rudolph
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recov… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recov… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recov… Johannes Rudolph
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discussion in quic-recov… Jana Iyengar