Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: provide guidance on PING usage (#3723)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 June 2020 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BD83A097D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 01:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DoCc800c3h1I for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 01:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B3D3A097C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 01:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-b2150d3.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-b2150d3.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.113.12]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF3DE163F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 01:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591603783; bh=aatCdRmofYbH1tD+CVuY04PTVwfuhlt80BGJrNhqbxM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MDDxbgNvmPPjUW9UuGes+o3SB75nVgvlrj9ekX2zutJQiodt8G6/NRO/u7SbMfCFc t0PwE2QFcZLA1zfFaGTBjVsRhrs96EexY85g2+LMjoMgZ5dVPdeDjGO/ys0YSVEKJM 8xkDuBGGLyexzeEz6Jkn+L71/MorIKNDzBzEPyII=
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 01:09:43 -0700
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5MVZRDE2Q76RDZNIN45HJUPEVBNHHCLGWQ3A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3723/640441353@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3723@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3723@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: provide guidance on PING usage (#3723)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eddf247606da_7fab3ffcb66cd96c16343f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aikmjwRMqaB_6r1CEu9LRuBQBMk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:09:46 -0000

Actually there is a section on "Session resumption versus Keep-alive" in the applicability draft already. Do we need to say more? Is that needed in the transport draft as well?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3723#issuecomment-640441353