Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] use a HANDSHAKE_DONE frame to drive the handshake to confirmation (#3145)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 25 October 2019 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E9912006F for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybajn16JzjM7 for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051C11200F4 for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:59:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571983171; bh=UB2nZmSHF9FhQR88Ve+BQAf7AFZ/0BWSqpxycaUzHgw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tY6UYExPudcvPhXu+BYO1QnvPHQfMVIRGJUPF3azOD8CMQXztQ98nGSgiGkYius5F uXHGJEnr21HOUcdM0KXH7nL/bZ4uqcco73K73dyiiSrXcPm+Qs5dTwwvgd/jnSSBes REyBKU24ibjR+CSBsPt2L3cPBPS62usVm18l0QTM=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] use a HANDSHAKE_DONE frame to drive the handshake to confirmation (#3145)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db28f434584e_413c3f913b0cd9682697c9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:59:34 -0000

I tend to agree with @martinthomson here. I do not think we should make the protocol complex just for enforcing the correct behavior.

Regarding clients using the receipt of an ACK for a 1-RTT packet as the alternative signal, I agree that that'd work, but I am not sure if we need to write it down. Writing it down (or mandating it) gives less incentive for the server to send HANDSHAKE_DONE.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: