Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)

Eric Kinnear <> Thu, 19 March 2020 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4118A3A1281 for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ky157dBDamnQ for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE923A127F for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B09B6A002D for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584661926; bh=qsTytkT8DYmGxns8xyhypqxj+vfQ8Mw75Rtbo/ROtSo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Ai4MxqmpJMEWL7lyV54MAZj5sxQ97kkXeFFL3s0vsLoB6x6KRwVD+mPazq31ExIxW ++/0eCTgFQmGC5a8dvsJ3whPJzeCHxf0VlhqiuPRbmHXGUo54vwj30N2TJjfan6Gfp 4ONHebX4J/hxOGYcb6jwHPHM6kWIXD0h26cyuCbM=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:52:06 -0700
From: Eric Kinnear <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3534/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7405a68b89a_7dda3fbd894cd96c800f1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:52:14 -0000

Ah cool, that's excellent then! :)

What's the state that gets created to track that case? If you retired them all upon getting RPT without checking to see if you had them yet, don't you still have to keep track of the RPT value or which ones you've already retired? I'm probably missing some other piece of state in this case... 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: