Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)

janaiyengar <> Fri, 07 December 2018 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDB312D4ED for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:23:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQZDd_S7qC0n for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:23:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC86E130934 for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 19:23:50 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544153030; bh=4o0Ygl7GSqru8YBPA/r1CNCDRsmwz1yjO2/m0rIcVl0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Fa2hQQiPmxyiW5HgD17cR3MXXsrAasoHWvo3ygFoLjzPOiLwGT8o2Au+gaNqvU86r OyyEIqUlSx3bWbG7AxGlkCi6WYXz3p3Rzvebu1g1hCFhwfPG7GVFTCqzqbmKPOQTJE dISE4SsgiyBM7MBcA4hren5V8fe2XfpjG6L81ZLQ=
From: janaiyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c09e7c6cb6a2_74e3f85b3ed45b82854f7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 03:23:54 -0000

Limiting to max_ack_delay sounds fine to me as I've said earlier.

If the RTT sample is used without ack_delay (current spec text) instead of ignoring, this causes the SRTT to increase which is safe. I'm fine with it.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: