Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MAY use the same CID as Initial packets (#1721)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D53131169 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K5XT10PPaeOh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3618F130E60 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:12:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1537830722; bh=FEDl/MxDcGx7E096TPZZDN6q3wvFXNouQHwvoTSJA/o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iPOgg2yNf6axBLAEgqwmZHFREjAHix6lIw7IMn3Kex8QQJK7gt/itTpRSzMWdt7b8 JiFRTcjxSkOw0ylD86jUv4uymohuJd74sT/UhNBs4cHa8TvZLzjsUGfZ4IeFDJDy/d H00a92bnFJlsHez1kT7M6kfe0IgU7cHGKU+aUCzk=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3e32316f8648290bb568fad2f9151db94c13d6bc92cf0000000117c1314192a169ce1547f95a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1721/424155464@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1721@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1721@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MAY use the same CID as Initial packets (#1721)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ba96f41edefd_3ca63fa5cded45c413907"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/axsIgHAeEn_ewg_uLybnpoewXZo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 23:12:05 -0000
Yes, we discussed that breakage in NYC and it seems like people are OK with it. Mostly. The change is already in. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1721#issuecomment-424155464
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MAY us… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify whether 0-RTT MA… Martin Thomson