Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6890712012A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:05:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uf2jGEnqvNxq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85891200B3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD23A0449 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:05:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1580925926; bh=EkO5a4sZW8QbmgsqYweuhGcmgfg+L8/DEVMUp+/b1LM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zUpVr1hgwPYIAp9EBjSqcqsABiNIljW35NN3vPNB3/PLZPhkbwcfUvdIoJHC16e0q QfDBZTrBAXUUpLU+d2B5n+hV2K4lk6QlTpES8EKXC3PSWgUgdJlS7WbxAie4/tVT8J fzPnP8Moaz2FhzMZSw4ybZPbRwAkiFqXKUjWAOEM=
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:05:26 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZECBJBIB2QYWQSQ554JA3GNEVBNHHCBYTETM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363/582536308@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3b03e6c0adb_6f1f3f7fc5ccd95c2652e0"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ay9yABKgWtBSD6h1CGE6TNJEan8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 18:05:29 -0000

I think the thought was that if you want microsecond resolution, the ack-frequency draft is what you should implement, since it can be sent after an RTT measurement of the path has been made.

But I'd be happy to discuss this tomorrow when we discuss ack-frequency.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363#issuecomment-582536308