IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make RST_STREAM a bit on STREAM frame (#775)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0A13421A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6IGcInKJrSx for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF6B133342 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=lddTtOqvooxq0eoxLSTgQ9UFFDg=; b=iQ0G4BBMnkULigTd LWWHAVKYkEvs6zVIh6/nKMHgxMwNXnfcYTEFoDfpk2INrm6cmRJkcKoEA8wSKFM5 JpBnm1XidyhvYPtPhpH2iuSStdb1ed1EtTxZcdFTBIB8tj/DYMxEJ6mVAfpoiZLH 87LKXdJ46noVfFZ6ZybVWyRbfdU=
Received: by filter0542p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0542p1mdw1-19452-59C14094-11 2017-09-19 16:06:44.163315647 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0041p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id qXHz09wSRVKjuCd9QCsEjw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:06:44.121 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:06:44 +0000
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abee3b013ef4fe45ef53dc01d9b8fd19775d47fe8392cf0000000115d9029392a169ce0f6980d1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/775/330589093@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/775@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/775@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make RST_STREAM a bit on STREAM frame (#775)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59c14093d2f59_5b823fd0173f0f8068542"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0wtwSkG4tLnEexMQKcTt5nvJ56PHNfxJBhIs IiUdc5RN2kUKmhubm7Tg3Ib+9yMOeYRSFmka2fiZN5fAIuh1x9EZm53/v4UXqu2e6LOxaKkWMnAWWE q/0TpnSfE2bMzQQtO5dQ4jGdPzZ5S7TG8wou0wNSzirIiWAWuIp06X5NwzOMobsp61pBzd+iCIrR/j g=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/b7i6uGwKfcnZWV_d3Xgw-sx1NxE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:06:49 -0000

I don't see the value in making it a bit on the STREAM frame, and I prefer the semantic that currently all STREAM frames are processed in sequence. RST_STREAM, no matter what you call it, will get processed immediately on receipt, which is quite different from a STREAM frame carrying, say, a FIN bit. Since RST_STREAM applies to specific streams, why would the logic be different to pass a RST_STREAM to your stream processor than it is to pass a STREAM frame with RST bit set?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/775#issuecomment-330589093

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status