Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN reporting (#1426)
Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 08:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701D7130E93 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 01:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wr85ypPnEiD5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 01:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4910412F18C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 01:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 01:23:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528359819; bh=1FHI8lSoWI3uCv/QRbgWnACNjCfeERsfLRITs3jWbAo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BsNc8J/fuH1AbtxGGZVW1QUHE/x9zDzwMZFTL+vulxSyOL+X4/iVDQY1ZwOE5O4c6 LH/1FVfbYruH9GieXwDS8jfTeMDUmTvb+oqTfskp2TcWMWk49bUalV1h4YxS92H2uY TU+DsQjxDRxK2LTHBLDbISK5dO2cJRkjIFYuc3ws=
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc8a8107630661c5159638e3192ae6e38f368d69092cf000000011730ad8b92a169ce13ade6f2@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1426/395335864@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1426@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1426@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN reporting (#1426)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b18eb8bc2aa5_40de2ab25d326f6034083f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/bDvFZjG07n5qu8tE0uZc3j4MtqY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:23:43 -0000
This is not a unique issue to QUIC! Setting ECN-CE is something I routinely do in ECN measurement work and we have talked about adding this to TCP, and it's mentioned in TSVWG docs - To do it with TCP requires accurate ECN feedback - which is similar to what is being proposed by the DT for QUIC - so this should be OK. A sender should not set CE often (if they are going to ignore markings), but as an infrequent probe I think it has useful properties… If it masks one CE mark every now and again, it's not a big deal - if the congestion marking rate is really that low, it is OK - if the sender sees other CE marks it knows to react. Since this is a generic ECN comment, I'd encourage discussion within TSVWG - where you may also attract more feedback from people with understanding of ECN. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1426#issuecomment-395335864
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN repor… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN r… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN r… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detect adversarial ECN r… ianswett