Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What indicates the end of a message? (#2230)

Martin Thomson <> Fri, 21 December 2018 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFE012D7EA for <>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:54:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guseCol3p2Eq for <>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D18BC126F72 for <>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:54:30 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1545364470; bh=8QPfd5VqlNVtPZqAk3l1Ja72kjJxUwIKejyPDK5sVqA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=IB1ZJFqmZ/jDYftQCx427IQBuExjwilvkujeR0u1APHb9qmoygQk/ilLL3HqkoolQ K+OuiOzj2oTJUvAYgc7r5e252X2c3gTyR08AaC/qucBR6hBdcIRg9kCgs5+2LlE52h Fu3WtIl+hovFOsjTGdKAv9cQQ/5U4fl+XByznbGA=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2230/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What indicates the end of a message? (#2230)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1c63f69a811_512f3ff1e44d45c07172a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 03:54:34 -0000

This is low on the list of ways in which HTTP is not great.  I'm not inclined to change it.

There is no prohibition on PUSH_PROMISE, just a recommendation against it.  That is, promises SHOULD precede any mention of the promised resource.  It's very likely that a promise after trailers is not useful, but there is no explicit prohibition.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: