Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets coalesced with other packets to make a 1200 byte UDP datagram could be split up by the network (#3317)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Sun, 05 January 2020 01:03 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFE912008F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 17:03:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saJSVzvKJ7tD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 17:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356F212008D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 17:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BE08C0087 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 17:03:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1578186203; bh=tDy1euqcP3NsHfQlEgqgasRx1He4RoNLXa3XZV07HZ4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qQBfzhr/AvGSaAdh9PgSpsORZBbTwzr2aYKzPER9o79R8G2JYiqBW2vy5yZXQdfmN oioy8mAptWmfySPAp49Y+pqxKSeiq34lXy2H2lygUhdsmw+kruwEwFzJqfNsFoAJ6+ +rKM3ona24mMNJWCGz/v2UteRtidNz6HIdBFXS9w=
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 17:03:23 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK72KMMYLPDETL62U354DZUFXEVBNHHCA7KIGA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317/570834155@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets coalesced with other packets to make a 1200 byte UDP datagram could be split up by the network (#3317)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1135db75f7_4a563fc152acd96c1559685"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/bXlS_ofMwVzTwe1NTElWQ4QPhCU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 01:03:26 -0000
Let's not do anything here. We'll get deployment experience with v1, and we might want to revisit this question afterwards, but we have no reason to believe that this is an important problem to solve in practice. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3317#issuecomment-570834155
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packets co… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Note that initial packet… Jana Iyengar