Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not? (#3887)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F573A11D8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjHo5c2w287i for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1BB3A1154 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A68520ED5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596582035; bh=FMiygqr20r0U9qzvLa3jk7RWM0x4pWPijIIFLnLVRpY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TtP7Zqx4bRp7XgmSHjkMKK8RO6VcuP8RX1yOQVHCI+pUJEDsGKMEv2OLfgjPiONkw PdvH10ve4WP+gmFu9oly+oZZHytMQqjfGs8+kuMkhXekcbJrWllOdssMc4vTCGJhAs 9R3do9XZkXEHXAWIr6bR8gfe9lEobNy4a6I5Pec4=
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:00:34 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5QEF2Q5URAHKUXNNF5GXEZFEVBNHHCN7H3EU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issue/3887/issue_event/3622323831@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3887@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3887@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not? (#3887)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f29e892ecf24_d9b16f8210998"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/b_EHw2tLc8Ct3MnCNzHizGlp7Zs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 23:00:37 -0000
Closed #3887 via #3900. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3887#event-3622323831
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not? (#… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet protection or not… Martin Thomson